Treatment for overweight and obesity in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis ================================================================================================ * Leslea Peirson * James Douketis * Donna Ciliska * Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis * Muhammad Usman Ali * Parminder Raina ## Abstract **Background** Obesity is a major public health issue. This review updates the evidence on the effectiveness of behavioural and pharmacologic treatments for overweight and obesity in adults. **Methods** We updated the search conducted in a previous review. Randomized trials of primary-care-relevant behavioural (diet, exercise and lifestyle) and pharmacologic (orlistat and metformin) with or without behavioural treatments in overweight and obese adults were included if 12-month, postbaseline data were provided for weight outcomes. Studies reporting harms were included regardless of design. Data were extracted and pooled wherever possible for 5 weight outcomes, 6 secondary health outcomes and 4 adverse events categories. **Results** We identified 68 studies, most consisted of short-term (≤ 12 mo) treatments using diet (*n* = 8), exercise (*n* = 4), diet and exercise (*n* = 10), lifestyle (*n* = 19), orlistat (*n* = 25) or metformin (*n* = 4). Compared with the control groups, intervention participants had a greater weight loss of −3.02 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] −3.52 to −2.52), a greater reduction in waist circumference of −2.78 cm (95% CI −3.34 to −2.22) and a greater reduction in body mass index of −1.11 kg/m2 (95% CI −1.39 to −0.84). The relative risk for loss of ≥ 5% body weight was 1.77 (95% CI 1.58–1.99, [number needed to treat 5, 95% CI 4–7]), and the relative risk for loss of ≥ 10% body weight was 1.91 (95% CI 1.69–2.16, [number needed to treat 9, 95% CI 7–12]). Incidence of type 2 diabetes was lower among pre-diabetic intervention participants (relative risk 0.62 [95% CI 0.50–0.77], number needed to treat 17 [95% CI 13–29]). With prevalence rates for type 2 diabetes on the rise, weight loss coupled with a reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes could potentially have a significant benefit on population health and a possible reduction in need for drug treatments for glycemic control. **Interpretation** There is moderate quality evidence that behavioural and pharmacologic plus behvioural, treatments for overweight and obesity in adults lead to clinically important reductions in weight and incidence of type 2 diabetes in pre-diabetic populations. Registration: PROSPERO no. CRD42012002753 Overweight and obesity are defined by a body mass index (BMI) of 25–29.9 and ≥ 30 kg/m2, respectively. An estimated one billion adults are overweight and at least 300 million are obese worldwide, with prevalence increasing in most countries.1 Obese adults are at increased risk for developing major diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, stroke, depression and certain cancers.2–4 It is estimated that one in 10 premature adult deaths is directly attributable to overweight and obesity.5,6 We provide an updated synthesis of the effectiveness of behavioural and pharmacologic interventions for treating overweight and obesity in adults. Whereas most systematic reviews on this topic have focused on anthropometric (e.g., weight and waist circumference)7,8 and biochemical outcomes (e.g., cholesterol and blood pressure),9–11 we aimed to also assess the effects of nonsurgical weight-loss interventions on clinically meaningful outcomes (e.g., 5% weight loss and incidence of type 2 diabetes). ## Methods ### Search strategy A recent high-quality (9/11 AMSTAR rating)12 review by the United States Preventive Services Task Force13 examined interventions for preventing obesity in overweight and obese populations. To avoid duplication, our protocol was designed to update their search. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO and Embase from September 2010 (the date of the last United States Preventive Services Task Force search) up to and including April 19, 2013. The full search strategy is provided in Appendix 1 (available at [www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1)). Reference lists from other systematic reviews were searched for studies not captured by our search. ### Population, intervention, comparator, outcome and setting statement Details regarding the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and setting for this review are provided in Box 1. Box 1: ### Description of population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and setting Population • Overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (BMI 30–39.9 kg/m2) adults aged 18 years and older Interventions • Behavioural (diet, exercise or lifestyle) and pharmacologic (orlistat or metformin) treatments for weight loss Comparator • Treatment effectiveness: no intervention, usual care, placebo or minimal intervention (e.g., newsletter or single information session on healthy living) • Treatment harms: any type of comparison group or no comparison group Outcomes • Treatment effectiveness: Primary weight outcomes: weight change in kg, loss of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% baseline body weight, change in BMI, change in waist circumference. Secondary health outcomes: total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, incidence of type 2 diabetes, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure • Treatment harms: Any adverse events, serious adverse events (requiring admission to hospital or urgent medical care), gastrointestinal events, and withdrawal from the study because of adverse events Settings • Generalizable to Canadian primary care or feasible for conducting in or referral from primary care; surgical and metabolic unit interventions were excluded as representing a level of obesity and comorbid conditions that would be less commonly used as referral points from primary care ### Inclusion and exclusion criteria The inclusion and exclusion criteria for this review are provided in Box 2. Box 2: ### Inclusion and exclusion criteria Studies were included if they met the following criteria: • Behavioural (diet, exercise or lifestyle strategies), pharmacologic (orlistat or metformin) or combined strategy trial of weight loss treatment or management • Intervention focused on adults ≥ 18 years old who were overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI 30–39.9 kg/m2) • Randomized controlled trial with a no-intervention, usual care, placebo or minimal component (e.g., single newsletter or information session on general health) comparison group (this condition applied only to studies assessing treatment effectiveness) • Reported data for one or more specified weight outcomes (i.e., weight change in kg, loss of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% of baseline body weight, change in waist circumference, and change in BMI) • Reported data for outcomes of interest at least 12 months postbaseline assessment • No restrictions on study design, comparison group, reporting of weight outcome or timing of assessment were applied to studies that reported data for harms of treatment • Results were published in English or French Studies were excluded if: • Treatment involved a surgical intervention or a drug other than orlistat or metformin • Intervention focused on morbidly obese adults (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) or specifically enrolled participants who were pregnant, had an eating disorder or a condition in which weight gain was a cardinal manifestation (e.g., metabolic syndrome or polycystic ovarian disease). • Intervention was conducted in an inpatient hospital, institutional or occupational setting or involved a school-based or faith-based program • The only available results were published in a language other than English or French ### Study selection, quality assessment and data abstraction Titles and abstracts of papers were reviewed independently by 2 team members. Any citation marked for inclusion by either team member went on to full-text screening, which was also done independently by 2 researchers. Randomized controlled trials were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for risk-of-bias assessment14 (Appendix 2, available at [www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1)). Overall strength of the evidence (identified as high, moderate, low or very low quality) was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework (GRADEpro version 3.2).15 One team member completed full-data abstraction and a second member verified all extractions. All data were checked in a third round of verification before analysis. Unadjusted immediate postassessment data were extracted where available. For a small number of studies, there were no immediate postassessment data; we chose the data point closest to the end of the intervention. For another small group of on-going studies, we extracted interim data (at 12 mo). We extracted data for all reported adverse events. At all levels, inter-rater disagreements were resolved through discussion. ### Data analysis For meta-analyses, immediate post-treatment data (means and standard deviations) were used for continous outcomes such as weight in kg, whereas number-of-events data were used for binary outcomes such as loss of ≥ 5% baseline body weight. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model with an inverse variance method was used to generate the summary measures of effect in the form of mean difference for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes.16 For studies with more than one treatment arm, we took different approaches depending on the similarity of the interventions. For similar interventions (e.g., 2 arms of a lifestyle intervention, one using phone contact and one using in-person support) we pooled the data to do a pairwise comparison with the control group. Alternatively, if groups were substantially different (e.g., low-calorie diet and high-intensity aerobic exercise) we included the data for each arm compared with the control group but split the sample size for the control group to avoid a unit-of-analysis error and double counting.14 All orlistat studies included an intervention of 120 mg thrice daily. Some studies also assessed smaller doses, but we only extracted data for effects of the consistently reported 120 mg dosage. Cochran’s *Q* (α = 0.10) and *I*2 statistics were used to quantify heterogeneity within and between subgroups. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate statistical stability and effect on statistical heterogeneity. For the outcome of weight in kg, we did subgroup analyses by focus of intervention (behavioural and pharmacologic plus behavioural) for all outcomes and comparisons (except sex for weight in kg and gastrointestinal adverse effects, which included studies in a single group). ## Results The search and selection process is presented in Figure 1. Sixty-eight studies (117 papers) were eligible for inclusion in this review.17–84 Thirty-six of these studies were brought forward from the 2011 USPSTF review13 that met our inclusion criteria and 32 studies were found in the recent literature. Of the 68 studies, 54 randomized controlled trials reported weight outcome data that could be pooled; 2 others provided eligible weight data that could not be pooled.51,55 The remaining 12 studies (2 studies were single-group pre-post designs, 1 study had a more active comparison group and 9 studies reported outcomes at < 12 mo) were only included in analyses of adverse events.24,29,57,63,75–81,83 High within-group heterogeneity was common; however, the direction of treatment effect was consistent across most studies and the confidence intervals overlapped. This statistical heterogeneity is likely due to small versus large treatment effects observed across studies. Table 1 presents a summary of the features of this body of evidence; details for individual studies are provided in the Appendix 3 (available at [www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1)). ![Figure 1:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/https://www.cmajopen.ca/content/cmajo/2/4/E306/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/F1) Figure 1: Search and selection flow diagram for articles on treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. View this table: [Table 1:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/T1) Table 1: **Summary of study characteristics** ### Weight outcomes Forty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis assessing weight change in kg.17–23,25–28,31,33–47, 49,50,52–54,56,59–61,64–74,82,84 Intervention participants had a significantly greater reduction in weight compared with the control group (Table 2 and Figures 2A and 2B). There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (behavioural or pharmacologic plus behavioural). Weight loss was greater in intervention participants than in control participants for both behavioural interventions and pharmacologic plus behavioural interventions. The test for subgroup differences based on type of behavioural intervention in the behavioural trials (diet, exercise, diet + exercise and lifestyle) was significant: interventions using exercise alone did not lead to significantly greater reductions in weight, whereas diet alone showed the largest difference between groups (Table 2). In the behavioural trials, the test for subgroup differences based on cardiovascular disease risk status was also significant: compared with the control group, changes in weight were greater for participants with low baseline risk than those with high baseline risk (Table 2). There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on any of the other variables considered in the subgroup tests (i.e., intervention duration, sex, type of drug and cardiovascular disease risk in pharmacologic trials) (Table 2). View this table: [Table 2:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/T2) Table 2: **Effect of intervention on weight (kg), by intervention focus and subgroup** ![Figure 2A:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/https://www.cmajopen.ca/content/cmajo/2/4/E306/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2A:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/F2) Figure 2A: Effect of behavioural treatment interventions on weight in kilograms. Note: 1 = intervention arm 1; 2 = intervention arm 2; F = females only; M = males only: 1F, 2F and 3F represent female participants in different intervention arms; 1M and 2M represent male participants in different intervention arms; CI = confidence interval; DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program; SD = standard deviation. ![Figure 2B:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/https://www.cmajopen.ca/content/cmajo/2/4/E306/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 2B:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/F3) Figure 2B: Effect of pharmacologic plus behavioural treatment interventions on weight in kilograms. Note: 2 = intervention arm 2; CI = confidence interval; DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program; SD = standard deviation. Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis assessing loss of ≥ 5% baseline body weight.17,19,20,27,33,36,38,39,45,53,54,58–60,62,64–68,70,72–74 Figure 3 shows intervention participants were more likely to lose ≥ 5% of their baseline body weight compared with control participants. There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (Table 3). ![Figure 3:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/https://www.cmajopen.ca/content/cmajo/2/4/E306/F4.medium.gif) [Figure 3:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/F4) Figure 3: Effect of treatment interventions on loss of ≥ 5% baseline body weight: overall and by focus of intervention (behavioural and pharmacologic plus behavioural). Note: CI = confidence interval; F = females only. View this table: [Table 3:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/T3) Table 3: **Effect of intervention on weight loss and diabetes outcomes, by intervention focus** Similarly, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis assessing loss of ≥ 10% baseline body weight.19,20,36,58–60,62,64–70,72,74 Intervention participants were more likely to lose ≥ 10% of their baseline body weight compared with controls. There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (Table 3). Twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis assessing change in BMI from baseline.18–23,25–28,30,32,37,46–50,52–54,56,61,66,73,84 Intervention participants had a greater reduction in BMI compared with the control groups. There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (Table 4). View this table: [Table 4:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/T4) Table 4: **Effect of intervention on BMI, waist circumference and secondary health outcomes, by intervention focus** Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis assessing change in waist circumference from baseline.17–22,25,26,28,33,34,36,37,45–47,49,50,52–54,56,58,59,61,65,66,69,71–74,84 Intervention participants had a greater reduction in waist circumference compared with controls. There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (Table 4). ### Secondary outcomes Meta-analyses showed greater improvements in intervention participants compared with control participants across all continuous secondary outcomes: total cholesterol,17,19–23,25,28,31,33,37,42,43,46–48,50,53,56,58,59,61,62,64,65,67–71,73,74,82 low-density lipoprotein cholesterol,19–23,25,28,31,33,42,43,45–47,53,56,58, 59,61,62,64,65,67–71,73,74,82 fasting blood glucose,19–22,26,28,31,37,45–48,50,53,56,58,64–72,74,82,84 and systolic17,19–22,25–28,31–34,37,40,42,43,45,47,53,54,58–61,64,66–74,82,84 and diastolic17,19–22,25–28,31–34,37,40,42,43,45,47,53,54,58–61,64,66,67,69–74,82,84 blood pressure (Table 4). For all but 2 of these outcomes, there was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention. The tests for subgroup differences were significant for total cholesterol and fasting glucose (Table 4). In both cases, when compared with the control groups, benefits were greater for participants in pharmacologic plus behavioural interventions than for those taking part in behavioural interventions alone. Nine studies were included in a meta-analysis assessing the risk of type 2 diabetes in prediabetic patients.45–47,50,51,55,72,82,84 A diagnosis of new onset type 2 diabetes was less likely to occur in intervention participants compared with the control group (Table 3). There was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (Table 3). ### Adverse effects Very few behavioural studies reported adverse events. When they did, harms were usually minor and related to injuries sustained during physical activity (e.g., joint, back or muscle pain; minor abrasions, bruises or blisters; and fractures). Most (about 80%) adverse events that occurred in orlistat trials (and some in metformin trials) were gastrointestinal disturbances. Commonly reported symptoms across studies were fatty or oily stool, increased defecation, increased urgency, abdominal pain, soft stools, oily spotting and flatulence. Most studies reported that the gastrointestinal events were typically mild or moderate in intensity and occurred only once or twice in the participants, usually near the beginning of treatment. Across the 17 studies with data that could be pooled, intervention participants were more likely to have an adverse event compared with control participants (Table 5).58–61,64,66,67,69–74,82,84 However, as indicated by the test for subgroup differences, participants in the 15 pharmacologic interventions were significantly more likely to have an adverse event (Table 5). Serious adverse events were defined as those requiring urgent medical care or admission to hospital, as well as those defined as serious by the primary authors. A meta-analysis of 14 studies showed no difference between the intervention and control groups for the risk of having serious adverse events, and there was no evidence that the effect of treatment differed based on focus of intervention (Table 5).20,27,57,59,61,66,67,70–73,77,79,84 Gastrointestinal events were reported only in studies that used drug interventions and in the 23 studies with data that could be pooled; those taking active medications were more likely to report these events than control participants.57,59,61–69,71–77,79,81–84 Likewise, participants in 25 pharmacologic studies were more likely to withdraw from their study because of adverse events compared with control participants (Table 5).46,56,58–77,79,81,82 View this table: [Table 5:](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/T5) Table 5: **Effect of intervention on any adverse events, serious adverse events, gastrointestinal events and withdrawals from the study because of adverse events, by intervention focus** ## Interpretation ### Main findings There are 3 principal findings from this review. First, the pooled-effect estimates for all weight outcomes were statistically significant in favour of the interventions and, compared with the control groups, intervention participants had, on average, a 3.02 kg greater weight loss, a 2.78 cm greater reduction in waist circumference, and a 1.11 kg/m2 greater reduction in BMI, and were more likely to lose ≥ 5% (RR 1.77) and ≥ 10% (RR 1.91) of their baseline body weight. Every kilogram of weight loss in people with impaired glucose tolerance is associated with a 16% reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes.85 Second, there was no significant difference between behavioural and pharmacologic interventions for any weight outcomes, although the potential for adverse outcomes appears greater with pharmacologic treatments. Third, modest weight reduction, corresponding to loss of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% of baseline body weight (number needed to treat 5 and 9, respectively) had clinically important effects, most notably a 38% reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes in prediabetic populations (number needed to treat 17). With prevalence rates for type 2 diabetes in the US and the European Union of 9.3% and 10%, respectively,86 coupled with its increasing prevalence, extrapolation of a 38% reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes could have a significant benefit on population health. Intervention participants also had small improvements in secondary outcomes; these effects may be of minor clinical significance at the individual level, but important at the population level. The benefits of treatment should be weighed against the harms. Few behavioural studies reported adverse events; those that did found a small absolute excess in the risk of injuries associated with physical activity. Participants on active medications reported significantly milder to moderate gastrointestinal disturbances than those on placebo. ### Comparison with other studies Updating the United States Preventive Services Task Force review search13 added 32 studies, but did not point to changes in any important outcomes. We used a more comprehensive approach of subgrouping studies based on behavioural interventions such diet, exercise and lifestyle changes to better reflect the evidence in the current literature. In addition to a modest reduction observed for measures of adiposity such as weight in kilograms, BMI and waist circumference, our review also found associated reductions in intermediate physiological outcomes such as blood pressure and incidence of type 2 diabetes, which reinforces the findings of other systematic reviews87,88,89 documenting reduction in the need for pharmacologic therapy for blood pressure and glycemic control as a potential clinical benefit of modest weight loss. ### Limitations Most evidence was derived from studies that could not be assessed comprehensively for risk of bias. Two-thirds of the pharmacologic studies had pre-randomization run-in periods that involved low-calorie diets with or without placebo, which may have exaggerated the potential benefits of treatment. Potential reporting bias was identified across a number of outcome and comparison-based study groupings. The relatively high attrition rates in many studies leads to further risk of bias. These methodological limitations reduced the strength of evidence, resulting in moderate- and sometimes low-quality ratings, which reduce confidence in the pooled estimates of effect. Results presented for the secondary outcomes should be interpreted with caution because we only included interventions where the focus was on weight loss. Adverse events may be overestimated; data were extracted as reported even when the connection to the intervention was not clear and even if run-in events were included. The search included papers in English or French only and thus may have missed studies in other languages. Most studies were of relatively short duration (≤ 12 mo), and there was a lack of evidence to address the question of whether (and for how long) weight loss is maintained after interventions are completed. ### Conclusion In summary, modest weight reduction confers clinically important benefits and a substantial reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes in prediabetic populations, with the potential to improve population health. Future research should include longer term follow-up to observe maintenance of weight loss, to study the effects of repeated weight loss and regain, and to determine if improvements in health outcomes are related to the intervention apart from weight loss. ### Supplemental information For reviewer comments and the original submission of this manuscript, please see [www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1](http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/2/4/E306/suppl/DC1) ## Acknowledgments **Contributors:** Leslea Peirson, Donna Ciliska, James Douketis, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis and Parminder Raina were involved in conceptualizing the study, data interpretation and writing the manuscript. Leslea Peirson, Donna Ciliska and Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis were involved in developing the methods, collecting the data and coordinating the project. Muhammad Usman Ali conducted the data analyses and contributed to writing the manuscript. All of the authors revised the manuscript, approved the final version submitted for publication and agreed to act as guarantors of the work. ## Acknowledgments **Disclaimer:** The views expressed herein are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CIHR. **Acknowledgements:** Rachel Warren, Meghan Kenny, Eva Tsakonas and Mary Gauld contributed to the relevance and quality assessment, and data-extraction phases. We are grateful to Maureen Rice for the search, Eva Tsakonas for contextual questions (results not reported here) and to Sharon Peck-Reid for database management and formatting of the report. Sarah Connor Gorber and Amanda Shane (Scientific Officers, Public Health Agency of Canada) contributed to the original protocol development and review of drafts of the technical report. Similarly, Paula Brauer, Maria Bacchus, Neil Bell, Elizabeth Shaw and Harminder Singh (members of the Adult Obesity Working Group of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care) provided comments on the protocol and initial analyses. The Task Force Chair, Cello Tonelli, provided valuable feedback on the manuscript. ## Footnotes * Competing interests: Donna Ciliska and Parminder Raina have received grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. James Douketis is a current member of the advisory boards for Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi and Pfizer. He was a member of the advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotie Therapies, Portola Pharmaceuticals and The Medicines Company. He also received speaker fees from AGEN Biomedical, Ortho-Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim, as well as a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim. No competing interests were declared by the other authors.. * Funding: Funding was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; [www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca](http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca)). The CIHR played no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation or decision to submit the paper for publication. Parminder Raina holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Geroscience and the Raymond and Margaret Labarge Chair in Research and Knowledge Application for Optimal Aging. ## References 1. *Obesity and overweight*. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2014. Available: [www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/](http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/) (accessed 2014 Sept. 17). 2. Eckersley RM. Losing the battle of the bulge: causes and consequences of increasing obesity. Med J Aust 2001;174:590-2. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11453334&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 3. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289:76-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.289.1.76&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12503980&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180136600029&link_type=ISI) 4. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, et al. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1867-72. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinte.162.16.1867&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12196085&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177976500009&link_type=ISI) 5. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, et al. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 2005;293:1861-7. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.293.15.1861&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15840860&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228401700024&link_type=ISI) 6. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, et al. Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA 1999;282:1530-8. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.282.16.1530&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10546692&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000083277800020&link_type=ISI) 7. Castañeda-Gonzalez L, Camberos-Solís R, Bacardi-Gascón M, et al. Long-term randomized clinical trials of pharmacological treatment of obesity: systematic review. Colomb Med 2010;41:17-25. 8. Felix HC, West DS. Effectiveness of weight loss interventions for obese older adults. Am J Health Promot 2013;27:191-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4278/ajhp.110617-LIT-259&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23286596&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 9. Aucott L, Gray D, Rothnie H, et al. Effects of lifestyle interventions and long-term weight loss on lipid outcomes - a systematic review. Obes Rev 2011;12:e412-25. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00819.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21371252&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 10. Santos FL, Esteves SS, da Costa PA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of the effects of low carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Rev 2012;13:1048-66. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01021.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22905670&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 11. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Roberts S, et al. Combined effects of aerobic exercise and diet on lipids and lipoproteins in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis. *J Obes* 2012;2012: 985902. 12. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1471-2288-7-10&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17302989&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 13. LeBlanc, E, O’Connor, E, Whitlock, EP, et al. Screening for and management of obesity and overweight in adults. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Report no.:11-05159-EF-1. 14. *Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions*. Version 5.1.0. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. 15. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. 2000. Introduction. Available: [www.gradeworkinggroup.org](http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org)*/*. 16. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3802833&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986F013900001&link_type=ISI) 17. Dekkers JC, van Wier MF, Ariëns GA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular risk factors among a Dutch overweight working population: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011;11:49 [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1471-2458-11-49&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21261935&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 18. Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Norman GJ, et al. Outcomes of a 12-month web-based intervention for overweight and obese men. Ann Behav Med 2011;42:391-401. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12160-011-9296-7&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21822750&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 19. Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh HC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1959-68. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1108660&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22085317&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000297282600006&link_type=ISI) 20. Wadden TA, Volger S, Sarwer DB, et al. A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1969-79. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1109220&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22082239&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000297282600007&link_type=ISI) 21. ter Bogt NC, Milder IE, Bemelmans WJ, et al. Changes in lifestyle habits after counselling by nurse practitioners: 1-year results of the Groningen Overweight and Lifestyle study. Public Health Nutr 2011;14:995-1000. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S1368980010003708&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21272417&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000290530400009&link_type=ISI) 22. Andrews RC, Cooper AR, Montgomery AA, et al. Diet or diet plus physical activity versus usual care in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: the Early ACTID randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:129-39. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60442-X&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21705068&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000292948800029&link_type=ISI) 23. Kirby ML, Beatty S, Stack J, et al. Changes in macular pigment optical density and serum concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin in response to weight loss. Br J Nutr 2011;105:1036-46. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0007114510004721&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21144093&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 24. Tsai AG, Wadden TA, Rogers MA, et al. A primary care intervention for weight loss: results of a randomized controlled pilot study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18:1614-8. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2009.457&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20019680&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 25. Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of exercise training in subjects with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome is dependent on exercise modalities and independent of weight loss. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2010;20:608-17. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.numecd.2009.04.015&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19695853&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 26. Vissers D, Verrijken A, Mertens I, et al. Effect of long-term whole body vibration training on visceral adipose tissue: a preliminary report. Obes Facts 2010;3:93-100. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20484941&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000277458200004&link_type=ISI) 27. Bennett GG, Warner ET, Glasgow RE, et al. Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:565-74. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22412073&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000302555300006&link_type=ISI) 28. Ross R, Lam M, Blair SN, et al. Trial of prevention and reduction of obesity through active living in clinical settings: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:414-24. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1972&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22371872&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000301381300009&link_type=ISI) 29. Donner TW, Magder LS, Zarbalian K. Dietary supplementation with d-tagatose in subjects with type 2 diabetes leads to weight loss and raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Nutr Res 2010;30:801-6. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.nutres.2010.09.007&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21147362&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 30. Janney CA, Jakicic JM. The influence of exercise and BMI on injuries and illnesses in overweight and obese individuals: a randomized control trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:1. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1479-5868-7-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20145731&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 31. Lim SS, Noakes M, Keogh JB, et al. Long-term effects of a low carbohydrate, low fat or high unsaturated fat diet compared to a no-intervention control. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2010;20:599-607. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.numecd.2009.05.003&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19692216&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000286128900007&link_type=ISI) 32. Anderssen S, Holme I, Urdal P, et al. Diet and exercise intervention have favourable effects on blood pressure in mild hypertensives: the Oslo Diet and Exercise Study (ODES). Blood Press 1995;4:343-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/08037059509077619&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8746601&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 33. Christian JG, Bessesen DH, Byers TE, et al. Clinic-based support to help overweight patients with type 2 diabetes increase physical activity and lose weight. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:141-6. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinternmed.2007.13&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18227359&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000252593800005&link_type=ISI) 34. Burke V, Beilin LJ, Cutt HE, et al. Effects of a lifestyle programme on ambulatory blood pressure and drug dosage in treated hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Hypertens 2005;23:1241-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/01.hjh.0000170388.61579.4f&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15894901&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000230716600020&link_type=ISI) 35. Cohen MD, D’Amico FJ, Merenstein JH. Weight reduction in obese hypertensive patients. Fam Med 1991;23:25-8. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2001777&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 36. Haapala I, Barengo NC, Biggs S, et al. Weight loss by mobile phone: a 1-year effectiveness study. Public Health Nutr 2009;12:2382-91. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S1368980009005230&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19323865&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000272312300021&link_type=ISI) 37. Kulzer B, Hermanns N, Gorges D, et al. Prevention of diabetes self-management program (PREDIAS): effects on weight, metabolic risk factors, and behavioral outcomes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1143-6. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIzMi83LzExNDMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMDoiL2NtYWpvLzIvNC9FMzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 38. Langford HG, Blaufox MD, Oberman A, et al. Dietary therapy slows the return of hypertension after stopping prolonged medication. JAMA 1985;253:657-64. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.1985.03350290063027&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3881608&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985ABN4800023&link_type=ISI) 39. Martin PD, Dutton GR, Rhode PC, et al. Weight loss maintenance following a primary care intervention for low-income minority women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:2462-7. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2008.399&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18787526&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 40. Stevens VJ, Corrigan SA, Obarzanek E, et al. Weight loss intervention in phase 1 of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention. The TOHP Collaborative Research Group. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:849-58. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinte.1993.00410070039006&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8466377&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1993KW47500006&link_type=ISI) 41. Stevens VJ, Obarzanek E, Cook NR, et al. Long-term weight loss and changes in blood pressure: results of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:1-11. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/0003-4819-134-1-200101020-00007&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11187414&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000166043300001&link_type=ISI) 42. Wood PD, Stefanick ML, Dreon DM, et al. Changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins in overweight men during weight loss through dieting as compared with exercise. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1173-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJM198811033191801&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3173455&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1988Q697500001&link_type=ISI) 43. Wood PD, Stefanick ML, Williams PT, et al. The effects on plasma lipoproteins of a prudent weight-reducing diet, with or without exercise, in overweight men and women. N Engl J Med 1991;325:461-6. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJM199108153250703&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1852180&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1991GA76300003&link_type=ISI) 44. Woollard J, Burke V, Beilin LJ, et al. Effects of a general practice-based intervention on diet, body mass index and blood lipids in patients at cardiovascular risk. J Cardiovasc Risk 2003;10:31-40. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00043798-200302000-00007&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12569235&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000181367700007&link_type=ISI) 45. Parikh P, Simon EP, Fei K, et al. Results of a pilot diabetes prevention intervention in East Harlem, New York City: Project HEED. Am J Public Health 2010;100(Suppl 1):S232-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2105/AJPH.2009.170910&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20147680&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 46. Morey MC, Pieper CF, Edelman DE, et al. Enhanced fitness: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of home-based physical activity counseling on glycemic control in older adults with prediabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:1655-62. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04119.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22985140&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 47. Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, et al. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:113-21. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.987&link_type=DOI) 48. Burtscher M, Gatterer H, Dünnwald T, et al. Effects of supervised exercise on gamma-glutamyl transferase levels in patients with isolated impaired fasting glucose and those with impaired fasting glucose plus impaired glucose tolerance. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2012;120:445-50. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1055/s-0032-1311642&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22639399&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 49. Foster-Schubert KE, Alfano CM, Duggan CR, et al. Effect of diet and exercise, alone or combined, on weight and body composition in overweight-to-obese postmenopausal women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:1628-38. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2011.76&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21494229&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 50. de Mello VD, Lindström J, Eriksson J, et al. Insulin secretion and its determinants in the progression of impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes in impaired glucose-tolerant individuals: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:211-7. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzNS8yLzIxMSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIwOiIvY21ham8vMi80L0UzMDYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 51. Ockene IS, Tellez TL, Rosal MC, et al. Outcomes of a Latino community-based intervention for the prevention of diabetes: the Lawrence Latino Diabetes Prevention Project. Am J Public Health 2012;102:336-42. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2105/AJPH.2011.300357&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22390448&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000299717500026&link_type=ISI) 52. Nakade M, Aiba N, Suda N, et al. Behavioral change during weight loss program and one-year follow-up: Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP) in Japan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2012;21:22-34. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22374557&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 53. Janus ED, Best JD, Davis-Lameloise N, et al. Scaling-up from an implementation trial to state-wide coverage: results from the preliminary Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study. Trials 2012;13:152. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1745-6215-13-152&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22929458&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 54. Nanchahal K, Power T, Holdsworth E, et al. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care of the Camden Weight Loss (CAMWEL) programme. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000793. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMi8zL2UwMDA3OTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMDoiL2NtYWpvLzIvNC9FMzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 55. Penn L, White M, Oldroyd J, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance: the European Diabetes Prevention RCT in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. BMC Public Health 2009;9:342. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1471-2458-9-342&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19758428&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 56. Derosa G, Cicero AF, D’Angelo A, et al. Effects of 1-year orlistat treatment compared to placebo on insulin resistance parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Pharm Ther 2012;37:187-95. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1365-2710.2011.01280.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21812797&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 57. Kopelman P, Groot GH, Rissanen A, et al. Weight loss, HbA1c reduction, and tolerability of cetilistat in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial in obese diabetics: comparison with orlistat (Xenical). Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18:108-15. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2009.155&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19461584&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 58. Berne C; Orilstat Swedish Type 2 Diabetes Study Group. A randomized study of orlistat in combination with a weight management programme in obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Diabet Med 2005;22:612-8. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01474.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15842517&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 59. Broom I, Wilding J, Stott P, et al., UK Multimorbidity Study Group. Randomised trial of the effect of orlistat on body weight and cardiovascular disease risk profile in obese patients: UK Multimorbidity Study. Int J Clin Pract 2002;56:494-9. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12296610&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177973200002&link_type=ISI) 60. Davidson MH, Hauptman J, DiGirolamo M, et al. Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999;281:235-42. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.281.3.235&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9918478&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000078052800028&link_type=ISI) 61. Derosa G, Mugellini A, Ciccarelli L, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the action of orlistat, fluvastatin, or both an anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, and lipid profile in obese patients with hypercholesterolemia prescribed a standardized diet. Clin Ther 2003;25:1107-22. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80070-X&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12809960&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000182628200005&link_type=ISI) 62. Finer N, James WP, Kopelman PG, et al. One-year treatment of obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:306-13. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.ijo.0801128&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10757623&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085659000006&link_type=ISI) 63. Hanefeld M, Sachse G. The effects of orlistat on body weight and glycaemic control in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2002;4:415-23. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1463-1326.2002.00237.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12406041&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000178964800012&link_type=ISI) 64. Hauptman J, Lucas C, Boldrin MN, et al. Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:160-7. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archfami.9.2.160&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10693734&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085361000013&link_type=ISI) 65. Hollander PA, Elbein SC, Hirsch IB, et al. Role of orlistat in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes. A 1-year randomized double-blind study. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1288-94. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIyMS84LzEyODgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMDoiL2NtYWpvLzIvNC9FMzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 66. Krempf M, Louvet JP, Allanic H, et al. Weight reduction and long-term maintenance after 18 months treatment with orlistat for obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:591-7. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.ijo.0802281&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12704403&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000182427600007&link_type=ISI) 67. Lindgärde F. The effect of orlistat on body weight and coronary heart disease risk profile in obese patients: the Swedish Multimorbidity Study. J Intern Med 2000;248:245-54. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00720.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10971792&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089193600009&link_type=ISI) 68. Miles JM, Leiter L, Hollander P, et al. Effect of orlistat in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1123-8. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIyNS83LzExMjMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMDoiL2NtYWpvLzIvNC9FMzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 69. Rössner S, Sjöström L, Noack R, et al. Weight loss, weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular risk factors after 2 years treatment with orlistat for obesity. European Orlistat Obesity Study Group. Obes Res 2000;8:49-61. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2000.8&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10678259&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085017500008&link_type=ISI) 70. Sjöström L, Rissanen A, Andersen T, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients. European Multicentre Orlistat Study Group. Lancet 1998;352:167-72. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11509-4&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9683204&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000074859800008&link_type=ISI) 71. Swinburn BA, Carey D, Hills AP, et al. Effect of orlistat on cardiovascular disease risk in obese adults. Diabetes Obes Metab 2005;7:254-62. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00467.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15811142&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228134000008&link_type=ISI) 72. Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, et al. XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care 2004;27:155-61. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIyNy8xLzE1NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIwOiIvY21ham8vMi80L0UzMDYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 73. Bakris G, Calhoun D, Egan B, et al. Orlistat improves blood pressure control in obese subjects with treated but inadequately controlled hypertension. J Hypertens 2002;20:2257-67. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00004872-200211000-00026&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12409965&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000179558600026&link_type=ISI) 74. Kelley DE, Bray GA, Pi-Sunyer FX, et al. Clinical efficacy of orlistat therapy in overweight and obese patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1033-41. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIyNS82LzEwMzMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMDoiL2NtYWpvLzIvNC9FMzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 75. Van Gaal LF, Broom JI, Enzi G, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of orlistat in the treatment of obesity: a 6-month dose-ranging study. Orlistat Dose-Ranging Study Group. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998;54:125-32. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s002280050433&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9626916&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 76. Muls E, Kolanowski J, Scheen A, et al; ObelHyx Study Group. The effects of orlistat on weight and on serum lipids in obese patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1713-21. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.ijo.0801814&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11753595&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000171828900023&link_type=ISI) 77. Broom I, Hughes E, Dodson P, et al., ORILSTAT UK Study Group. The role of orlistat in the treatment of obese patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolaemia: consequences for coronary risk. Brit J Cardio. 2002;9:460-8. 78. Seifarth C, Schehler B, Schneider HJ. Effectiveness of metformin on weight loss in non-diabetic individuals with obesity. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2013;121:27-31. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23147210&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 79. Smith SR, Stenlof KS, Greenway FL, et al. Orlistat 60 mg reduces visceral adipose tissue: a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:1796-803. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/oby.2011.143&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21720429&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 80. Thomas EL, Makwana A, Newbould R, et al. Pragmatic study of orlistat 60 mg on abdominal obesity. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:1256-62. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/ejcn.2011.108&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21697820&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 81. He H, Zhao Z, Chen J, et al. Metformin-based treatment for obesity-related hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Hypertens 2012;30:1430-9. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/HJH.0b013e328353e249&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22525206&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 82. Fontbonne A, Charles MA, Juhan-Vague I, et al. The effect of metformin on the metabolic abnormalities associated with upper-body fat distribution. BIGPRO Study Group. Diabetes Care 1996;19:920-6. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIxOS85LzkyMCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIwOiIvY21ham8vMi80L0UzMDYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 83. Lim SS, Norman RJ, Clifton PM, et al. The effect of comprehensive lifestyle intervention or metformin on obesity in young women. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2011;21:261-8. [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20163941&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 84. The Diabetes Prevention Program. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes [published erratum in *Diabetes Care* 1999;22:1389]. Diabetes Care 1999;22:623-34. [Abstract](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIyMi80LzYyMyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIwOiIvY21ham8vMi80L0UzMDYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 85. Lau DC, Teoh H. Benefits of modest weight loss on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Can J Diabetes 2013;37:128-34. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.03.023&link_type=DOI) 86. *Health Topics Diabetes: Data and Statistics*. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2013.Available: [www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/diabetes/data-and-statistics](http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/diabetes/data-and-statistics) (accessed 2014 Sept. 17). 87. Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, Berghold A, et al. Long-term effects of weight-reducing diets in hypertensive patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(9):CD008274. 88. Ross SA, Dzida G, Vora J, et al. Impact of weight gain on outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:1431-8. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1185/03007995.2011.585396&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21599553&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) 89. Gillett M, Royle P, Snaith A, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the risk of diabetes in people with impaired glucose regulation: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1-236, iii-iv. [CrossRef](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3310/hta16150&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.cmajopen.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22935084&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcmajo%2F2%2F4%2FE306.atom) * © 2014 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors