PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hanley, Gillian E. AU - Niu, Jin AU - Han, Jihee AU - Fung, Sharon AU - Bryant, Heather AU - Kwon, Janice S. AU - Huntsman, David G. AU - Finlayson, Sarah J. AU - McAlpine, Jessica N. AU - Miller, Dianne AU - Earle, Craig C. TI - Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis AID - 10.9778/cmajo.20210219 DP - 2022 Apr 01 TA - CMAJ Open PG - E466--E475 VI - 10 IP - 2 4099 - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/10/2/E466.short 4100 - http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/10/2/E466.full SO - CMAJ2022 Apr 01; 10 AB - Background: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period.Methods: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations.Results: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS).Interpretation: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.