Table 4:

Mixed-effects model results for patients aged 75 years or more with neurocognitive disorders before and after implementation of the Quebec Alzheimer Plan*

VariableNo. (%) of patientsAdjusted mean difference (95% Cl)ICC
Before
n = 455
After
n = 490
No. of contacts with Family Medicine Group, mean ± SD7.9 ± 10.29.9 ± 9.71.57 (0.30–2.84)0.12
Quality of follow-up score, mean ± SD48.0 ± 20.054.6 ± 18.86.58 (3.92–9.23)0.08
Cognitive testing226 (50.1)
n = 451
239 (49.2)
n = 486
Evaluation of functional status317 (69.7)397 (81.0)
Evaluation of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia318 (69.9)398 (81.2)
Evaluation of weight§265 (59.3)
n = 447
346 (70.9)
n = 488
Evaluation of caregiver needs107 (24.0)
n = 445
133 (28.0)
n = 475
Documentation of driving status52 (13.1)
n = 398
98 (23.7)
n = 414
No anticholinergic medication385 (84.6)396 (80.8)
Evaluation of home-based service needs237 (52.1)294 (60.0)
Evaluation of community service needs8 (1.8)33 (6.7)
Management of dementia medications (memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors)**94 (54.3)
n = 173
105 (66.9)
n = 157
OR (95% Cl)
Antipsychotic medication117 (25.7)98 (20.0)0.66 (0.47–0.95)0.04
Memantine or cholinesterase inhibitors prescribed by Family Medicine Group††27 (71.0)
n = 38
26 (72.2)
n = 36
0.81 (0.23–2.81)0.01
Referral to memory clinic after diagnosis‡‡40 (11.8)
n = 338
29 (8.5)
n = 340
0.66 (0.37–1.16)0.001
Justified referral§§¶¶31 (77.5)27 (93.1)
 Uncertainty14 (45.2)16 (59.3)
 Family request4 (12.9)6 (22.2)
 Presence of depression2 (6.4)3 (11.1)
 Complex medication management4 (12.9)0 (0.0)
 Complex patient management11 (35.5)10 (37.0)
Other reason§§1 (2.5)0 (0.0)
Unjustified referral§§8 (20.0)2 (6.9)
 No prior evaluation4 (50.0)1 (50.0)
 No justification4 (50.0)1 (50.0)
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient, OR = odds ratio, SD = standard deviation.

  • * Model estimates adjusted for age, sex and number of medications.

  • Except where noted otherwise.

  • Excluding patients who refused the evaluation.

  • § Excluding patients for whom the evaluation was not feasible.

  • Excluding patients for whom the evaluation was not applicable.

  • ** Excluding patients who did not take medication or did not had a follow-up visit after the prescription.

  • †† Excluding patients who received their prescription before the study period or did not take medication.

  • ‡‡ Excluding patients referred before the study period.

  • §§ Proportions of subgroups.

  • ¶¶ There could be more than 1 reason for referral.