Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Literature Review Describing the Role of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Trial Programs and Interventions Designed to Prevent Workplace Disability

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective Return-to-work (RTW) coordination has been suggested as an effective strategy for preventing workplace disability, but the scope of these services is not well described. The objective of this study was to describe the activities of RTW coordinators in published trials to provide a basis for establishing necessary competencies. Methods A keyword search of MEDLINE and CINAHL databases was conducted to identify intervention studies with a RTW coordinator providing direct, on-site workplace liaison to reduce work absences associated with physical health ailments. This search yielded 2,383 titles that were inspected by two examiners. Using a stepwise process that allowed for assessment of inter-observer agreement, 90 full articles were selected and reviewed, and 40 articles (22 studies) met criteria for inclusion. Results All but two studies (of traumatic brain injury) focused on musculoskeletal conditions or work injuries. Twenty-nine RTW coordinator activities were identified, but there was variation in the training background, workplace activities, and contextual setting of RTW coordinators. Based on reported RTW coordinator activities, six preliminary competency domains were identified: (1) ergonomic and workplace assessment; (2) clinical interviewing; (3) social problem solving; (4) workplace mediation; (5) knowledge of business and legal aspects; and (6) knowledge of medical conditions. Discussion Principal activities of RTW coordination involve workplace assessment, planning for transitional duty, and facilitating communication and agreement among stakeholders. Successful RTW coordination may depend more on competencies in ergonomic job accommodation, communication, and conflict resolution than on medical training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Lost-worktime injuries and illnesses: characteristics and resulting time away from work. USDL 05-2312; 2004.

  2. Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada. National work injury and disease statistics, Table 1: Number of accepted time-loss injuries, by jurisdiction 1982–2005, December 2006.

  3. Institute of Medicine. Health and safety needs of older workers. Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2004.

  4. Stoddard S, Jans L, Ripple J, Kraus L. Chartbook on work and disability in the United States, 1998. An InfoUse report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; 1998.

  5. Wasiak R, Kim J, Pransky G. Work disability and costs caused by recurrence of low back pain: longer and more costly than in first episodes. Spine 2006;31:219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, Gervais J, Falardeau M. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pransky G, Shaw W, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers – current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26:625–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pergola T, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management services for injured workers. Providers' perspectives. AAOHN J 1999;47:397–404.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brain GF, Conlon MF. The case management approach to work-related injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:831–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Durand MJ, Vezina N, Loisel P, Baril R, Richard MC, Diallo B. Workplace interventions for workers with musculoskeletal disabilities: a descriptive review of content. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:123–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Verbeek J, Salmi J, Pasternack I, Jauhiainen M, Laamanen I, Schaafsma F, Hulshof C, van Dijk F. A search strategy for occupational health intervention studies. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:682–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvine E. Workplace-based return to work literature review group. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32:257–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, deVet HCW, Knol DL, Loisel P, van Mechelen W. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? Spine 2007;32:291–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Urlings IJM, Bongers PM, de Vroome EMM, van Mechelen W. Participatory ergonomics as a return-to-work intervention: a future challenge? Am J Ind Med 2003;44:273–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steenstra IA, Anema JR, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, van Mechelen W. Cost effectiveness of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick leave due to low back pain, design of a population based controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;4:26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steenstra IA, Anema JR, van Tulder MW, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, van Mechelen W. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:557–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arnetz BB, Sjogren B, Rydehn B, Meisel R. Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45(5):499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feuerstein M, Callan-Harris S, Hickey P, Dyer D, Armbruster W, Carosella AM. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders: long-term effects. J Occup Environ Med 1993;35:396–403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Ortiz JM, Shaw WS, Miller VI, Wood PM. Integrated case management for work-related upper extremity disorders: impact of patient satisfaction on health and work status. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45:803–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lincoln AE, Feuerstein M, Shaw WS, Miller VI. Impact of case manager training on worksite accommodation in workers’ compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:237–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw WS, Feuerstein M. Generating workplace accommodations: lessons learned from the Integrated Case Management study. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Lincoln AE, Miller VI, Wood PM. Case management services for work related upper extremity disorders. Integrating workplace accommodation and problem solving. AAOHN J 2001;49:378–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Miller VI, Wood PM. Identifying barriers to recovery from work related upper extremity disorders: use of a collaborative problem solving technique. AAOHN J 2003;51:337–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grayson D, Dale AM, Bohr P, Wolf L, Evanoff B. Ergonomic evaluation: part of a treatment protocol for musculoskeletal injuries. AAOHN J 2005;53:450–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Haig AJ, Linton P, McIntosh M, Moneta L, Mead PB. Aggressive early medical management by a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation: effect on lost time due to injuries in hospital employees. J Occup Med 1990;32:241–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mutanen P, Roine R, Hurri H, Pohjolainen T. Mini-intervention for subacute low back pain: two-year follow-up and modifiers of effectiveness. Spine 2004;29:1069–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, Lemaire J. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997;22:2911–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Loisel P, Durand M-J, Diallo B, Vachon B, Charpentier N, Labelle J. From evidence to community practice in work rehabilitation: the Quebec experience. Clin J Pain 2003;19:105–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Loisel P, Durand P, Abenhaim L, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, Esdaile JM. Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:597–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Loisel P, Gosselin L, Durand P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Abenhaim L. Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain. Appl Ergon 2001;32:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand M-J, Champagne F, Stock S, Diallo B, Tremblay C. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six-year follow-up study. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:807–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Durand M, Vachon B, Loisel P, Berthelette D. Constructing the program impact theory for an evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work 2003;21:233–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Loisel P, Durand M. Worker accommodation, clinical intervention and return to work. In: Sullivan T, Frank J, editors. Preventing and managing disabling injury at work. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2003. p. 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Loisel P, Falardeau M, Baril R, Durand M, Langley A, Sauve S, Gervais J. The values underlying team decision-making in work rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:561–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahrens A, Mulholland K. Vocational rehabilitation and the evolution of disability management: an organizational case study. J Voc Rehab 2000;15:39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA. The effect of managed care on surgical rates among individuals filing for workers’ compensation. J Occup Environ Med 1998;40:623–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA, Schaefer JA, Lavin RA, Tsai SP. An ergonomics program designed to reduce the incidence of upper extremity work related musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Environ Med 1999;41(12):1032–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA, Schaefer JA, Tsai S. A facilitated early return to work program at a large urban medical center. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42:1172–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP. Managed care for workers’ compensation: three years of experience in an “employee choice” state. J Occup Environ Med 1996;38:1091–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP. Ten years’ experience using an integrated workers’ compensation management system to control workers’ compensation costs. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45:508–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Green-McKenzie J, Parkerson J, Bernacki E. Comparison of workers’ compensation costs for two cohorts of injured workers before and after the introduction of managed care. J Occup Environ Med 1998;40:568–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Green-McKenzie J, Rainer S, Behrman A, Emmett E. The effect of a health care management initiative on reducing workers’ compensation costs. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:1100–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McGrail MP Jr, Tsai SP, Bernacki EJ. A comprehensive initiative to manage the incidence and cost of occupational injury and illness: report of an outcomes analysis. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37:1263–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Burton WN, Conti DJ. Disability management: corporate medical department management of employee health and productivity. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42:1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Davis PM, Badii M, Yassi A. Preventing disability from occupational musculoskeletal injuries in an urban, acute and tertiary care hospital: results from a prevention and early active return-to-work safely program. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:1253–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Feldstein A, Breen V, Dana N. Prevention of work-related disability. Am J Prev Med 1998;14(3S):33–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Feldstein A, Marino G. Managed occupational health care in an HMO. HMO Pract 1997;11(4):158–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Feldstein A, Breen V. Prevention of work-related disability. Occup Med 1998;13(4):841–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hart T, Dijkers M, Fraser R, Cicerone K, Bogner JA, Whyte J, Malec J, Waldron B. Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006;21(6):467–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Linz DH, Ford LF, Nightingale MJ, Shannon PL, Davin JS, Bradford CO, Shepherd CD. Care management of work injuries: results of a 1-year pilot outcome assurance program. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43:959–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kennedy MQ, Badger E, Pompeii L, Lipscomb HJ. The North Country On the Job Network: a unique role for occupational health nurses in a community coalition. AAOHN J 2003;51:204–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lipscomb HJ, Moon SD, Li L, Pompeii L, Kennedy MQ. Evaluation of the North Country on the Job Network: a model of facilitated care for injured workers in rural upstate New York. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:246–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Malec JF, Buffington ALH, Moessner AM, Thompson JM. Maximizing vocational outcome after brain injury: integration of medical and vocational hospital-based services. Mayo Clin Proc 1995;70:1165–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Russo D, Innes E. An organizational case study of the case manager’s role in a client’s return-to-work programme in Australia. Occup Ther Int 2002;9:57–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brines J, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Pergola T. Return to work experience of injured workers in a case management program. AAOHN J 1999;47:365–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Brines J, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Pergola T, Connon C. Injured workers’ perceptions of case management services: a descriptive study. AAOHN J 1999;47:355–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Salazar MK, Graham KY. Evaluation of a case management program: summary and integration of findings. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):416–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Tsai JH, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management for injured workers: a descriptive study using a record review. AAOHN J 1999;47(9):405–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Herrin J, Carling C, Oxman AD. Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients. Spine 2002;27:2734–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Herrin J, Oxman AD. A call for action: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain. Spine 2002;27:561–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Oxman AD. Active sick leave for patients with back pain: all the players onside, but still no action. Spine 2002;27:654–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cooper JE, Tate R, Yassi A. Work hardening in an early return to work program for nurses with back injury. Work 1997;8:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yassi A, Tate R, Cooper JE, Snow C, Vallentyne S, Khokhar JB. Early intervention for back-injured nurses at a large Canadian tertiary care hospital: an evaluation of the effectiveness and cost benefits of a two-year pilot project. Occup Med 1995;45:209–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure 1960;20:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Genrich SJ, Neatherlin JS. Case manager role. A content analysis of published literature. Care Manage J 2001;3(1):14–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by research funding from the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and the Liberty Mutual Group (Project CDR 06-03), Boston, MA, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA

    William Shaw & Glenn Pransky

  2. Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

    William Shaw & Glenn Pransky

  3. Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada

    Quan-nha Hong & Patrick Loisel

Authors
  1. William Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quan-nha Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Glenn Pransky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Loisel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, W., Hong, Qn., Pransky, G. et al. A Literature Review Describing the Role of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Trial Programs and Interventions Designed to Prevent Workplace Disability. J Occup Rehabil 18, 2–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation