Immediate post-symposium survey: spread outputs
| Quantitative survey items (closed-ended questions) | Qualitative survey items (open-ended questions) | |
|---|---|---|
| Item | n (%)* | Summary of responses and comments |
| Innovators (n = 21 respondents) | ||
| Intend to follow up with interested clinical leads and Dragon-Facilitators | No intention of following up (n = 1): not applicable | |
| Yes | 20 (95) | |
| No | 1 (5) | |
| Expected method of follow-up with interested parties (could select multiple answers) | Follow-up method to be determined with teams based on mutual interests | |
| Individually (email or phone) | 17 (85) | |
| Follow-up meeting | 6 (30) | |
| Create a committee | 4 (20) | |
| Would recommend the symposium to a colleague | Would not recommend symposium (n = 1): did not meet current needs | |
| Yes | 19 (90) | |
| No | 1 (5) | |
| Missing | 1 (5) | |
| Would like to be invited to a second edition | Symposium highlights:
| |
| Yes | 20 (95) | |
| No | 1 (5) | |
| Clinical leads and Dragon-Facilitators (n = 61 respondents) | ||
| Symposium format met the objective of discovering new innovations | Innovation discovered:
| |
| Agree | 53 (86) | |
| Disagree | 4 (7) | |
| Missing | 4 (7) | |
| Likelihood of adopting or supporting an innovation in the next year, mean ± SD† | 8.02 ± 1.63 | – |
| Would recommend the symposium to a colleague | Would not recommend symposium (n = 1): good intentions, but did not meet needs | |
| Yes | 59 (96) | |
| No | 1 (2) | |
| Missing | 1 (2) | |
| Would like to be invited to a second edition | Symposium highlights:
| |
| Yes | 59 (96) | |
| No | 1 (2) | |
| Missing | 1 (2) | |