Use of theory (1 criterion, 79.2%) | Innovations developed with theory | 19 (79.2) | 5 (20.8) | 0 |
Impact assessments (6 criteria, 79.2%) | Acceptability | 21 (87.5) | 2 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) |
Feasibility | 21 (87.5) | 2 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) |
Efficacy‡ | 19 (79.2) | 4 (16.7) | 1 (4.2) |
Adaptability | 13 (54.2) | 8 (33.3) | 3 (12.5) |
Effectiveness | 22 (91.7) | 2 (8.3) | 0 |
Results documented | 20 (83.3) | 4 (16.7) | 0 |
Cost assessments (2 criteria, 77.1%) | Cost-effectiveness‡ | 16 (66.7) | 7 (29.2) | 1 (4.2) |
Resources needed for the scaling up (affordability) | 21 (87.5) | 2 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) |
Setting assessments (3 criteria, 59.7%) | Implemented in setting comparable to target setting | 14 (58.3) | 10 (41.7) | 0 |
Compatibility with similar innovations in target settings‡ | 11 (45.8) | 11 (45.8) | 2 (8.3) |
Consistency with policy directives | 18 (75.0) | 6 (25.0) | 0 |
Coverage assessments (4 criteria, 54.2%) | Reach | 11 (45.8) | 9 (37.5) | 4 (16.7) |
Adoption‡ | 14 (58.3) | 8 (33.3) | 2 (8.3) |
Fidelity | 6 (25.0) | 16 (66.7) | 2 (8.3) |
Maintenance | 21 (87.5) | 3 (12.5) | 0 |