Article Figures & Tables
Tables
- Table 1:
Description of innovations from 24 teams recruited for the Symposium on Innovations
Category of innovation according to the International Classification of Health Interventions* Scalability ranking; no. of innovations† Type Subtype High (10–16 criteria assessed) Medium (4–9 criteria assessed) Low (0–3 criteria assessed) Total Management, n = 15 Navigating 8 0 1 9 Collaborating 1 2 1 4 Prescription 1 1 0 2 Prevention, n = 8 Capacity building 2 1 3 Public health surveillance 2 1 0 3 Marshalling health services or health-related services 0 1 0 1 Restrictions on advertising, promotion or sponsorship of products 1 0 0 1 Therapeutic, n = 1 Assisting or promoting exercise 1 0 0 1 Total 16 6 2 24 Assessment dimension (no. of criteria, arithmetic mean* of the percentages of innovations that assessed the criteria of each dimension) Criterion† No. (%) of innovations Criterion assessed Criterion not assessed Criterion not applicable Use of theory (1 criterion, 79.2%) Innovations developed with theory 19 (79.2) 5 (20.8) 0 Impact assessments (6 criteria, 79.2%) Acceptability 21 (87.5) 2 (8.3) 1 (4.2) Feasibility 21 (87.5) 2 (8.3) 1 (4.2) Efficacy‡ 19 (79.2) 4 (16.7) 1 (4.2) Adaptability 13 (54.2) 8 (33.3) 3 (12.5) Effectiveness 22 (91.7) 2 (8.3) 0 Results documented 20 (83.3) 4 (16.7) 0 Cost assessments (2 criteria, 77.1%) Cost-effectiveness‡ 16 (66.7) 7 (29.2) 1 (4.2) Resources needed for the scaling up (affordability) 21 (87.5) 2 (8.3) 1 (4.2) Setting assessments (3 criteria, 59.7%) Implemented in setting comparable to target setting 14 (58.3) 10 (41.7) 0 Compatibility with similar innovations in target settings‡ 11 (45.8) 11 (45.8) 2 (8.3) Consistency with policy directives 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0) 0 Coverage assessments (4 criteria, 54.2%) Reach 11 (45.8) 9 (37.5) 4 (16.7) Adoption‡ 14 (58.3) 8 (33.3) 2 (8.3) Fidelity 6 (25.0) 16 (66.7) 2 (8.3) Maintenance 21 (87.5) 3 (12.5) 0 ↵* Arithmetic mean = sum of the percentages of innovations that assessed the criteria in each dimension divided by the total number of criteria in that dimension, e.g., for the dimension coverage: 54.2% = (45.8% + 58.3% + 25.0% + 87.5%) ÷ 4.
↵† The assessment data come from the teams’ responses to the Innovation Scalability Self-administered Questionnaire. (8)
↵‡ Percentages in the row may add up to ± 100% because of rounding error.